Paper draft sociology

Paper draft sociology

In Shall and Manacle’s “The codes of gender,” purport for Jimmy’s wife to keep her role as the completely immerse parent is shown. The associated attributes of femininity, one being affectionate, call for a more appropriate designation as the caretaker of the child, thusly meaning that women, Jimmy Wallaby’s wife, are(is) more apt for taking care of the work load of the children and home. While the associated attributes of masculinity that are portrayed in the film, such as strong and independent code for the men to appropriately fill the working role above the role of the household maintenance .

Or maybe if he were to swap roles, Jimmy believed hat his family would be worse off due to stalled revolution because his wife might not be able to make an equivalent salary, in which case he’ll make more money, ergo better provision financially for the family. And if any of these are Jimmy’s belief, then he would deem his intervention with his wife and his current situation unnecessary and for the roles of the household to remain. Aside from Jimmy’s personal beliefs, there are many possible outside consequences and complications that could be developed from leaving work to tend to his family. In his heart of hearts, Jimmy wanted to rise up the Amerce ladder,” (Hooch’s lid 1997: 129) by this, Jimmy felt that leaving work may negatively affect his chances at rising to the top, or even hinder his progression overall in the workplace . Although he didn’t desire to rise to the absolute top, Jimmy wanted to not just “level out” (Household 1997:129). So by staying at work and replacing his hours for home, he would appear more enthusiastic in his job, in turn bettering his reputation.

A more direct outside force that would make Jimmy Wallaby’s interest be heavily in his job at Amerce would be that similar to that of Sam Heat’s boss. Jimmy Waylaid loud have been averting application for paternity leave because of the situation Sam Hyatt faced with his boss. The boss wanted Sam to take the time he requested for paternity leave, to be personal time off, time off of vacation because he didn’t want to do too much work by enabling his fatherly duties, “it’s too much paperwork” (Household 1994:121).

By avoiding to request for the time off, his reputation and pay were unharmed. In the short future, Jimmy found himself as a manager; he too found that there was even less family time. And despite his desire to involve himself in his family-life, he as inactive in the household and his child’s life, and ended up as a long-hour worker. With paternity leave available, Waylaid had a great opportunity to father his child. According to Lore, in The Social Construction of Gender, she states that there are “socially imposed standards for men and women” (Lore 1991 14).

These aforementioned standards are often times a reason for not taking something such as paternity leave, which ‘defies’ the norms of society. In the past for centuries a woman, which is feminine, holds the characteristics of a caretaker and therefore is dealt the responsibility of the household. Even recently, Women that are involved in careers that in the past were only “men’s jobs” take time off of work to tend to their children.

So if one is to take paternity leave, the people may pester one alike their ribbing of Sam Hyatt saying are you “catching up on the soaps,” (Household 1 997:1 20) hinting at the women like connotations that taking work off for family has. What Jimmy could argue with the naysayer is that he wouldn’t be babysitting his child like other’s may refer to it as, but he would be responsibly engaging in the raising and fathering of his child. The consideration of people’s opinion makes a erect impact on whether one, like Jimmy, may make.

His actually reasoning among others surprising turned out to be simple. No, he was not trying to avoid an “evil eye,” (Household 1 997:1 32) nor was Jimmy unaware of his abilities to proceed with such a program as paternity leave, nor was he afraid of losing his job. Jimmy and many others were looking for the “recognition it promised in return for a full-scale dedication of their time to the company/’ (Household 19971132). If Jimmy Waylaid and workers like him were to dedicate a majority of their time to their work life, then their reputations at irk would pay off.

Jimmy would not have to worry about looking “like a loser, a goof-off, deadwood,” but conversely be considered “someone who puts in an incredible amount of time,” “A serious player’ (Household 1997:130). Through Earlier Household’s The Time Bind, and in particular with the individual case of Jimmy Waylaid, I have been able to see how the attributes of gender have contributed to the work place at a company such as Amerce. Have been able to see the trend of how people gender specific roles of either sex and how it has affected people’s decisions, reputations, and uniqueness related to balancing home-life and work-life.

The accompanying pieces of work such as Actually, and Kevin Manacle’s “The Codes of Gender,” and Judith Lore’s The Social Construction of Gender, have put into perspective the evolution of gender in society and where it is up until recently. Since Jimmy Waylaid did not take advantage of the work-family balance program by taking paternity leave, a role reversal to that of maternity leave in the past, shows that we as a society are still in a transitional state. The stalled revolution has yet to cease, and the overall eradication of the bubble standards that are faced between men and women in relation to home-life is Incomplete.

Please follow and like us:
Haven’t found the essay you want?